PM2.5 is 1.4 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 1.4/22 × 0.5 = <0.1 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
▼ 3.2 µg/m³ less fine-particle pollution than Kamloops right now
PM2.5 is 5.2 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 5.2/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 5.3 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 5.3/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 6.5 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 6.5/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 7 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 7/22 × 0.5 = 0.2 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 7.4 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 7.4/22 × 0.5 = 0.2 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 7.4 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 7.4/22 × 0.5 = 0.2 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 8.4 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 8.4/22 × 0.5 = 0.2 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 8.4 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 8.4/22 × 0.5 = 0.2 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 8.8 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 8.8/22 × 0.5 = 0.2 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 8.8 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 8.8/22 × 0.5 = 0.2 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
PM2.5 is 11.9 µg/m³ here vs 4.6 back home.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h out ≈ 11.9/22 × 0.5 = 0.3 here; 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 at home.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
Clear skies! Twelve hours out here is roughlyPM2.5 here is 4.6 µg/m³.Berkeley Earth: 22 µg/m³ for 24 h ≈ 1 cigarette.12 h outside ≈ 4.6/22 × 0.5 = 0.1 cigarettes.A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking.See how we work it out →
That is the fine-particle pollution you'd breathe standing outside all day inKamloops right now, turned into a number your body already understands.
A health-impact equivalence, not literal smoking: Berkeley Earth puts a full day at 22 µg/m³ of PM2.5 at about one cigarette.How we work this out
Why live rankings?
Smoke plumes are patchy and move with changing winds, terrain and weather. Nearby lakefront, coastal and higher-elevation places can be much clearer than Kamloops, but no direction is reliably cleaner. That is why this list is recalculated from live PM2.5 readings every hour instead of publishing a fixed escape route. If everything within three hours is smoky, the rankings will say so. Sometimes the honest answer is to stay inside with a filter running.